CHips L MINI SHELL

CHips L pro

Current Path : /proc/3/task/3/root/proc/2/cwd/usr/share/man/man3/
Upload File :
Current File : //proc/3/task/3/root/proc/2/cwd/usr/share/man/man3/TAP::Parser::Result::Test.3pm

.\" Automatically generated by Pod::Man 2.22 (Pod::Simple 3.13)
.\"
.\" Standard preamble:
.\" ========================================================================
.de Sp \" Vertical space (when we can't use .PP)
.if t .sp .5v
.if n .sp
..
.de Vb \" Begin verbatim text
.ft CW
.nf
.ne \\$1
..
.de Ve \" End verbatim text
.ft R
.fi
..
.\" Set up some character translations and predefined strings.  \*(-- will
.\" give an unbreakable dash, \*(PI will give pi, \*(L" will give a left
.\" double quote, and \*(R" will give a right double quote.  \*(C+ will
.\" give a nicer C++.  Capital omega is used to do unbreakable dashes and
.\" therefore won't be available.  \*(C` and \*(C' expand to `' in nroff,
.\" nothing in troff, for use with C<>.
.tr \(*W-
.ds C+ C\v'-.1v'\h'-1p'\s-2+\h'-1p'+\s0\v'.1v'\h'-1p'
.ie n \{\
.    ds -- \(*W-
.    ds PI pi
.    if (\n(.H=4u)&(1m=24u) .ds -- \(*W\h'-12u'\(*W\h'-12u'-\" diablo 10 pitch
.    if (\n(.H=4u)&(1m=20u) .ds -- \(*W\h'-12u'\(*W\h'-8u'-\"  diablo 12 pitch
.    ds L" ""
.    ds R" ""
.    ds C` ""
.    ds C' ""
'br\}
.el\{\
.    ds -- \|\(em\|
.    ds PI \(*p
.    ds L" ``
.    ds R" ''
'br\}
.\"
.\" Escape single quotes in literal strings from groff's Unicode transform.
.ie \n(.g .ds Aq \(aq
.el       .ds Aq '
.\"
.\" If the F register is turned on, we'll generate index entries on stderr for
.\" titles (.TH), headers (.SH), subsections (.SS), items (.Ip), and index
.\" entries marked with X<> in POD.  Of course, you'll have to process the
.\" output yourself in some meaningful fashion.
.ie \nF \{\
.    de IX
.    tm Index:\\$1\t\\n%\t"\\$2"
..
.    nr % 0
.    rr F
.\}
.el \{\
.    de IX
..
.\}
.\" ========================================================================
.\"
.IX Title "TAP::Parser::Result::Test 3"
.TH TAP::Parser::Result::Test 3 "2018-03-19" "perl v5.10.1" "User Contributed Perl Documentation"
.\" For nroff, turn off justification.  Always turn off hyphenation; it makes
.\" way too many mistakes in technical documents.
.if n .ad l
.nh
.SH "NAME"
TAP::Parser::Result::Test \- Test result token.
.SH "VERSION"
.IX Header "VERSION"
Version 3.42
.SH "DESCRIPTION"
.IX Header "DESCRIPTION"
This is a subclass of TAP::Parser::Result.  A token of this class will be
returned if a test line is encountered.
.PP
.Vb 2
\& 1..1
\& ok 1 \- woo hooo!
.Ve
.SH "OVERRIDDEN METHODS"
.IX Header "OVERRIDDEN METHODS"
This class is the workhorse of the TAP::Parser system.  Most \s-1TAP\s0 lines will
be test lines and if \f(CW\*(C`$result\->is_test\*(C'\fR, then you have a bunch of methods
at your disposal.
.SS "Instance Methods"
.IX Subsection "Instance Methods"
\fI\f(CI\*(C`ok\*(C'\fI\fR
.IX Subsection "ok"
.PP
.Vb 1
\&  my $ok = $result\->ok;
.Ve
.PP
Returns the literal text of the \f(CW\*(C`ok\*(C'\fR or \f(CW\*(C`not ok\*(C'\fR status.
.PP
\fI\f(CI\*(C`number\*(C'\fI\fR
.IX Subsection "number"
.PP
.Vb 1
\&  my $test_number = $result\->number;
.Ve
.PP
Returns the number of the test, even if the original \s-1TAP\s0 output did not supply
that number.
.PP
\fI\f(CI\*(C`description\*(C'\fI\fR
.IX Subsection "description"
.PP
.Vb 1
\&  my $description = $result\->description;
.Ve
.PP
Returns the description of the test, if any.  This is the portion after the
test number but before the directive.
.PP
\fI\f(CI\*(C`directive\*(C'\fI\fR
.IX Subsection "directive"
.PP
.Vb 1
\&  my $directive = $result\->directive;
.Ve
.PP
Returns either \f(CW\*(C`TODO\*(C'\fR or \f(CW\*(C`SKIP\*(C'\fR if either directive was present for a test
line.
.PP
\fI\f(CI\*(C`explanation\*(C'\fI\fR
.IX Subsection "explanation"
.PP
.Vb 1
\&  my $explanation = $result\->explanation;
.Ve
.PP
If a test had either a \f(CW\*(C`TODO\*(C'\fR or \f(CW\*(C`SKIP\*(C'\fR directive, this method will return
the accompanying explanation, if present.
.PP
.Vb 1
\&  not ok 17 \- \*(AqPigs can fly\*(Aq # TODO not enough acid
.Ve
.PP
For the above line, the explanation is \fInot enough acid\fR.
.PP
\fI\f(CI\*(C`is_ok\*(C'\fI\fR
.IX Subsection "is_ok"
.PP
.Vb 1
\&  if ( $result\->is_ok ) { ... }
.Ve
.PP
Returns a boolean value indicating whether or not the test passed.  Remember
that for \s-1TODO\s0 tests, the test always passes.
.PP
If the test is unplanned, this method will always return false.  See
\&\f(CW\*(C`is_unplanned\*(C'\fR.
.PP
\fI\f(CI\*(C`is_actual_ok\*(C'\fI\fR
.IX Subsection "is_actual_ok"
.PP
.Vb 1
\&  if ( $result\->is_actual_ok ) { ... }
.Ve
.PP
Returns a boolean value indicating whether or not the test passed, regardless
of its \s-1TODO\s0 status.
.PP
\fI\f(CI\*(C`actual_passed\*(C'\fI\fR
.IX Subsection "actual_passed"
.PP
Deprecated.  Please use \f(CW\*(C`is_actual_ok\*(C'\fR instead.
.PP
\fI\f(CI\*(C`todo_passed\*(C'\fI\fR
.IX Subsection "todo_passed"
.PP
.Vb 3
\&  if ( $test\->todo_passed ) {
\&     # test unexpectedly succeeded
\&  }
.Ve
.PP
If this is a \s-1TODO\s0 test and an 'ok' line, this method returns true.
Otherwise, it will always return false (regardless of passing status on
non-todo tests).
.PP
This is used to track which tests unexpectedly succeeded.
.PP
\fI\f(CI\*(C`todo_failed\*(C'\fI\fR
.IX Subsection "todo_failed"
.PP
.Vb 1
\&  # deprecated in favor of \*(Aqtodo_passed\*(Aq.  This method was horribly misnamed.
.Ve
.PP
This was a badly misnamed method.  It indicates which \s-1TODO\s0 tests unexpectedly
succeeded.  Will now issue a warning and call \f(CW\*(C`todo_passed\*(C'\fR.
.PP
\fI\f(CI\*(C`has_skip\*(C'\fI\fR
.IX Subsection "has_skip"
.PP
.Vb 1
\&  if ( $result\->has_skip ) { ... }
.Ve
.PP
Returns a boolean value indicating whether or not this test has a \s-1SKIP\s0
directive.
.PP
\fI\f(CI\*(C`has_todo\*(C'\fI\fR
.IX Subsection "has_todo"
.PP
.Vb 1
\&  if ( $result\->has_todo ) { ... }
.Ve
.PP
Returns a boolean value indicating whether or not this test has a \s-1TODO\s0
directive.
.PP
\fI\f(CI\*(C`as_string\*(C'\fI\fR
.IX Subsection "as_string"
.PP
.Vb 1
\&  print $result\->as_string;
.Ve
.PP
This method prints the test as a string.  It will probably be similar, but
not necessarily identical, to the original test line.  Directives are
capitalized, some whitespace may be trimmed and a test number will be added if
it was not present in the original line.  If you need the original text of the
test line, use the \f(CW\*(C`raw\*(C'\fR method.
.PP
\fI\f(CI\*(C`is_unplanned\*(C'\fI\fR
.IX Subsection "is_unplanned"
.PP
.Vb 2
\&  if ( $test\->is_unplanned ) { ... }
\&  $test\->is_unplanned(1);
.Ve
.PP
If a test number is greater than the number of planned tests, this method will
return true.  Unplanned tests will \fIalways\fR return false for \f(CW\*(C`is_ok\*(C'\fR,
regardless of whether or not the test \f(CW\*(C`has_todo\*(C'\fR.
.PP
Note that if tests have a trailing plan, it is not possible to set this
property for unplanned tests as we do not know it's unplanned until the plan
is reached:
.PP
.Vb 5
\&  print <<\*(AqEND\*(Aq;
\&  ok 1
\&  ok 2
\&  1..1
\&  END
.Ve

Copyright 2K16 - 2K18 Indonesian Hacker Rulez